Discussion:
BBC spoiler for today, 13/5/24
(too old to reply)
v***@gmail.com
2024-05-13 12:21:35 UTC
Permalink
Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises

He gets firm with Denise, tell husband and get into bed, socks off!
Whatis Kirsty involved with? Cricket? We got beaten. Must Do Better.
BrritSki
2024-05-13 12:27:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises
He gets firm with Denise, tell husband
I think Adam is more likely to "get firm" with the husband rather than
Denise ;)
Sam Plusnet
2024-05-13 17:12:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises
He gets firm with Denise, tell husband and get into bed, socks off!
Whatis Kirsty involved with? Cricket? We got beaten. Must Do Better.
"Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises"

Shouldn't there be some punctuation in there?

Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty, over promises.

Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty over-promises.
--
Sam Plusnet
Steveski
2024-05-13 23:03:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Plusnet
Post by v***@gmail.com
Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises
,snip>
Post by Sam Plusnet
Shouldn't there be some punctuation in there?
Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty, over promises.
Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty over-promises.
Not unless you're an advocate of the Oxford comma.
--
Steveski
J. P. Gilliver
2024-05-14 03:33:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steveski
Post by Sam Plusnet
Post by v***@gmail.com
Adam lays down his conditions and Kirsty over promises
,snip>
Post by Sam Plusnet
Shouldn't there be some punctuation in there?
Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty, over promises.
Adam lays down his conditions, and Kirsty over-promises.
Not unless you're an advocate of the Oxford comma.
I agree with Sam that some punctuation would improve clarity; the
_first_ suggested comma there is not an Oxford one. (I am an advocate of
it, anyway; to me, its absence always implies an unintended connection
between the last two members of a list - and it always puzzled me how
its absence became the norm.)
And I do see the humour in one of the above versions too!
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)***@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

… too popular actually to be any good. - Alison Graham in Radio Times 2-8
February 2013
Loading...